![](/irbis_low/images/db_navy.gif) Юристам - Електронний каталог НБУВ ![](/irbis_low/images/db_navy.gif) Юристам - Наукова електронна бібліотека ![](/irbis_low/images/db_navy.gif) Юристам - Реферативна інформація ![](/irbis_low/images/db_navy.gif) Юристам - Автореферати дисертацій ![](/irbis_low/images/db_navy.gif) Юристам - Інформаційні ресурси Інтернет ![](/irbis_low/images/db_navy.gif) Юристам - Електронні колекції ![](/irbis_low/images/db_navy.gif) Юристам - Інформаційно-аналітичні матеріали
![Mozilla Firefox](../../ico/mf.png) |
Для швидкої роботи та реалізації всіх функціональних можливостей пошукової системи використовуйте браузер "Mozilla Firefox" |
|
|
Формат представлення знайдених документів: | повний | стислий |
Пошуковий запит: ((<.>U=Х$<.>)+(<.>RZN=Х$<.>))*((<.>U=Х$<.>)+(<.>RZN=Х$<.>))*((<.>U=Х$<.>)+(<.>RZN=Х$<.>))*(<.>A=LOEWEN$<.>+<.>A=JAMES$<.>) |
Загальна кількість знайдених документів : 2
Представлено документи з 1 до 2
|
| | | | |
1. |
Loewenstein, J. The author's due: printing and the prehistory of copyright [Electronic resource] / J. Loewenstein. - Chicago : The University of Chicago Press, 2002. - 358 p. Переклад назви: Завдяки автору: Друкарство та історія авторського права
Рубрики:
Географічні рубрики:
Повний текст доступний у читальних залах НБУВ
The Author's Dueoffers an institutional and cultural history of books, the book trade, and the bibliographic ego. Joseph Loewenstein traces the emergence of possessive authorship from the establishment of a printing industry in England to the passage of the 1710 Statute of Anne, which provided the legal underpinnings for modern copyright. Along the way he demonstrates that the culture of books, including the idea of the author, is intimately tied to the practical trade of publishing those books. As Loewenstein shows, copyright is a form of monopoly that developed alongside a range of related protections such as commercial trusts, manufacturing patents, and censorship, and cannot be understood apart from them. The regulation of the press pitted competing interests and rival monopolistic structures against one anotherguildmembers and nonprofessionals, printers and booksellers, authors and publishers. These struggles, in turn, crucially shaped the literary and intellectual practices of early modern authors, as well as early capitalist economic organization. With its probing look at the origins of modern copyright, The Author's Duewill prove to be a watershed for historians, literary critics, and legal scholars alike.
Кл.слова: копірайт -- інтелектуальна власність
| |
| | | | |
2. |
Loewen, James W.. The Confederate and neo-Confederate reader [Electronic resource] : the great truth about the lost cause / J. W. Loewen. - Jackson : University Press of Mississippi, 2010. - 438 p. Переклад назви: Хрестоматія конфедератських і неоконфедератських текстів: велика правда щодо "нездійсненної справи"
Рубрики:
Географічні рубрики:
Повний текст доступний у читальних залах НБУВ
Anyone who knows the history of the Civil War and its aftermath and who talks with members of the public quickly grows frustrated. Most recent high school graduates, many history and social studies teachers, and even some professional historians whose training is in other areas hold basic misconceptions about the era. Questions about why the South seceded, what the Confederacy was about, and the nature and later use of its symbols and ideology often give rise to flatly untrue “answers.” In turn, these errors persist because most Americans do not know and have never read key documents in American history about the Confederacy. The documents included here also make a case for teaching every American the word and the concept “historiography.” Most concisely, historiography means “the study of history,” but not just “studying history.” Historiography asks us to scrutinize how a given piece of history came to be written. Who wrote it? When? With whom were they in debate? What were they trying to prove? Who didn’t write it? What points of view were omitted? Especially on the subjects of slavery, secession, and race—the core of this volume—Confederate and neo-Confederate statements change depending upon where people wrote or spoke, and when and why. Why did Confederates say they seceded for slavery in 1861 but not in 1891? Why did neo-Confederates claim in 1999, but not in 1869, that thousands of African Americans served in the Confederate armed forces? Teachers can use questions like these to get students to understand and do historiography on the documents in this collection.
Кл.слова: громадянська війна у США -- рабовласництво -- сегрегація -- аболіціонізм
| |
|
|